1983 and ‘84 were years of embarrassing spectacle for Nova Scotia’s 30,000 blacks. An audit of the government funded Black United Front (BUF) revealed that executive director Haamid Rasheed had used BUF funds to pay for insurance on his private vehicle, had mysteriously received nearly $5,000 in payroll advances, and had somehow failed to forward over $9,000 in staff benefits and income tax remittances to Revenue Canada. In the protracted swirl of allegations and denials that followed these revelations, Rasheed was dismissed, and eventually provincial funding was withdrawn from the organization.
Frank Boyd worked for BUF in 1973 and ‘82, for the Human Rights Commission in the 1960’s, as a consultant, and during the events of BUF’s demise in 1984 he was director of the Black Cultural Centre for Nova Scotia. The decline of Rasheed’s BUF, as he explains it, has a lot to do with the original place of the organization in the power politics of minorities in the ‘60’s and ‘70’s, and the role of state agencies in demobilizing public unrest. Editor,
New Maritimes Magazine Vol. 3, No. 6, at pp. 10-13, where this article originally appeared.
Keep the Faith, Baby: Black Panthers Staying Away
“I draw the line in the dust,” said Alabama governor George Wallace, “and throw the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.
Wallace wasn’t the only person throwing down gauntlets in the 1960’s. Martin Luther King Jr. told a throng of some 200,000 Americans that he had a dream, “that one day, on the red hills of Georgia, sons of former slaves and sons of former slave-owners will be able to sit together at the table of brotherhood.”
Black Nova Scotians were caught up in these strong currents of social change. They responded, in truly Canadian fashion, in a manner that was more orderly, organized and restrained than the black revolution in the United States.
Racism in Nova Scotia was a more discreet business than segregation in Alabama. Colour lines were (and still are) drawn in housing, social services, and community activities, but these lines were quietly enforced. The black community in Nova Scotia had responded to this racist climate by developing its own institutions and by trying to soften the worst aspects of discrimination.
This quiet climate started to change in the 1960’s. One key moment was the Nova Scotia Human
Rights Federation meeting in Halifax, held on two days beginning Friday, December 6, 1968;
and one key element was the perception that the Black Revolution, symbolized by the militant Black Panthers, might suddenly come north.
“No Black Panthers will coming to Halifax to disrupt the human rights conference this
weekend.” Black power activist Burnley “Rocky” Jones announced on Radio CJCH the day before the conference began.
But the presence of the Panthers had stirred the Halifax Black community, forcing it to speak out as never before. The Human Rights Federation meeting became a forum for the expression of long suppressed black sentiments.
“The black people of Nova Scotia do not in any way themselves with the views of the Black Power movement,” said Nova Scotia African Baptist Association moderator the late Ross Kenny.
“We want homes,” a black woman from Preston pleaded; “we ye got the land . we’ve got the men; we’ve got the work power give us a chance.”
“The thing the Panthers have done - which most blacks in Halifax haven’t done - is think out the problem . . . one of the most rewarding ethnic experiences I’ve had with the Panthers is learning how they think, how they point out the contradictions in the white standard as applied to the black society,” said Halifax lawyer Don Oliver.
“Your (White peoples’) enemy is not Black Power, but ignorance of the Black man as a human being,” said Nova Scotia Home for Coloured Children matron Mary Paris, and she queried: “Can you discern the signs of the times?”
“I see the possibility of violence but if it occurs, it will be an imported thing . . . spawned by outside agitators,” said Baptist minister Rev. Wrenfred Bryant.
“I look to the Black United Front,” said Windsor schoolteacher Wilhelmina Williams, “to bring about a new dignity in the Nova Scotia Negro.”
At the federation’s conference that Friday night, former Progressive Conservative premier, the late Senator G. I. Smith, promised far—reaching changes in human rights legislation. Twenty—four hours later, the Premier announced the appointment of a white, Ontario newsman, Marvin Schiff, to the post of the first full—time human rights director.
Rather than appease black community leaders, the move enraged them. Black leaders charged that qualified black applicants were ignored. Marvin Schiff, Nova Scotia’s first human rights director, had his work cut out for him - his first assignment -- to investigate his own appointment.
“I’m bloody mad, and I don’t like much what I heard here this morning,” Schiff said. “I can only promise you that I’m committed to this job, not just for blacks but for every minority group,” adding that “If they [black applicants] got short shift, it makes me very angry.”
If there had been any doubt in the minds of black and white people that Black Power was essential to obtaining justice, the hiring of Marvin Schiff changed all that. The Black United Front took hold of the hearts and minds of black as well as white Nova Scotians. The human rights conference followed by just one week the conception of BUF at a “black family meeting” held in Halifax. At that meeting I was present. We chose to seek Black Power. Instead we lost our liberty.
Seek Black Power, Lose Liberty: The Founding BUF MeetingIN 1969 SOME black Nova Scotians thought that with $500,000 and the Black United Front they could change the world.
As time has shown it was not that simple. In their innocence, they not count on the money and the power changing them, too.
On August 15, 1969, Health Minister John Munro and Minister of State Gerard Pelletier announced a $500,000 grant to BUF. At a press conference in Halifax, Munro described the grant as a means of assisting an under—privileged group to control their own destiny.
On the last day of November 1968 - a typical frosty-cold and dark November evening -some 400 blacks from around the province met for the first time (and only) time, in a black family meeting at the Halifax North End Library.
I, like many others, was seated on the floor of a room full to overcrowding, waiting for what everybody was waiting to see and hear — the Black Panthers speak.
They spoke eloquently. They were true race men, stirring everyone s emotions and sense of national pride. They made us determined to change decades of neglect and exploitation — the racist legacy which had so recently destroyed the community of Africville. They gave us pride in being black, a sentiment rarely shared together.
The Black Panthers then stepped aside yielding the floor to the local leader. When church and statecraft come together as they so often do in the black community, whose power and glory are greater than those of the black preacher?
Rev. W.P. Oliver rose like Moses and eked out the following consensus from the teeming room: to investigate the feasibility of establishing a black united front, similar to the one the Reverend described operating in the United States.
By the time Rev. Oliver spoke to the press several days later, the concept had become much clearer to him. A BUF, he explained, would not “take the initiative in future action, it will be a co-coordinating and catalytic body.” It would not be an independent organization, but an “umbrella” for all existing black organizations in the province.
Mandated with this responsibility was an ‘‘interim committee”. Those appointed that evening were: Rev. W.P. Oliver, Burnley “Rocky” Jones, Miss Edith Gray, Ross Kinney, Keith Prevost, H.A.J. “Gus” Wedderburn, councillor Arnold Johnson, social worker Buddy Daye and Churchill Smith. In all, these people made up an interim committee of nine.
Assembled in the auditorium that evening were the province’s black elite. There were others who were there solely by virtue of their proximity to the meeting place. Few realizes that in the balance rested job opportunities, new salaries, not to mention career progression — the things which matter most to a highly disadvantaged group. Like vultures, some came prepared to fight for these benefits, and fight they did.
Those who knew what was at stake went to the meeting and spoke eloquently where
possible, anticipating the social and economic changes and opportunities that were about to come. Those who understood the gravity of the situation, but who were not well placed or respected within the Black community went to watch because the meeting had generated so much publicity. Others went to see a good fight. When the battle was over most were satisfied it had gone in accordance with plan of the leaders.
The black family meeting barred all whites, including the press, and denied all white citizens access to a major city, owned institution and a public library auditorium. The glow of Black Power was within us. A segregated meeting, held in a public place, led by a clergyman of the African Baptist Association, had never occurred before in the long history of blacks in Nova Scotia. Never in our homes, never in our churches or public meeting places, never on festive occasions, but it did happen in a facility owned and operated by the city of Halifax.
It was a perfectly natural reaction to enjoy a meeting from which those whites who had barred us for so long from barber shops and other public places, were now being barred -- even though it was from one isolated, individual meeting. Or so we thought. How they did protest, those who had been barred. And how wrong we were to allow it, and to think of what was happening merely in terms of its publicity, and our personal hidden agendas, rather than in terms of its impact on race relations and on some friendships we had enjoyed all our lives!
So the stage was set for a large turnout at the black family meeting. The publicity had worked. I know of no larger turnout of black people in living memory, funerals accepted. However, the price of admission was higher than we thought. Giving away the hard and bitterly earned currency of collective experience in Nova Scotia – the currency of years of indifference,
discrimination, joblessness, and the everyday struggle for life to our “black leaders” of the moment -- was a tragic mistake. It was all too easy, all too fast. It seemed to us then that time was of the essence.
Perhaps the interim committee’s mandate allowed them to select an Ottawa delegation to seek funds to establish a now— feasible BUF, but somehow taking this step seems to have been beyond the power granted the interim committee by the black family meeting. The committee never reported to the black family meeting on the feasibility of BUF. In fact another black family meeting was never held, not even after the committee had acted on its finding that a BUF was feasible. In fact, the committee formed the nucleus for a board of directors who were never mandated by the black family meeting.
So it was on these undemocratic foundations that Rasheed’s BUF was built. The mechanics of BUF’s foundation were ill conceived, behind closed doors. It is to this legacy of expediency that all past and future BUF’s must look for their tradition.
Dawn The Politics of the Minority GameThe Internal Politics
JULES OLIVER was hired as executive director of BUF when his father had been chairman of the interim committee and then became “special adviser” to and honorary chairman of the board of directors, but not before Jules’ uncle, Halifax lawyer Donald Oliver, resigned as chairman of the personnel committee, charged with the responsibility to recruit, among other personnel, the executive director. The appearance of nepotism notwithstanding, the black leaders chose Jules Oliver.
The every-man-for-himself game went beyond Jules Oliver’s appointment and continued through the term of office of his successor, Art Criss (Haamid Rasheed). It ended when the public was made aware of Rasheed’s dismissal in March 1984. The factors creating the likelihood of the abuse of power date back to the points of consensus reached during the black family meeting: denying information to, and only allowing input from, local whites through trusted and recognized black leaders.
We black Nova Scotians were to have the discipline of a political party, but unlike a party, we were to have no control over, or input into, the party’s policy—making in any open or democratic way. The fact is that historically black Nova Scotians have never been allowed to really believe in democracy for themselves; moreover, that English Canadians have never really wanted it for others is of little consequence. The fact that slavery is a poor training ground for democracy is no excuse and inconsequential. The galling thing is, however, that we black Nova Scotians denied ourselves democracy by destroying the democracy potential of 1969 by ourselves and for it we have no one to blame but ourselves.
In 1969, if we did not like what we saw in the policies of our black leaders we had no opportunity to vote against them. By the time some form of democracy was restored -- when popular elections were first held on June 8 1974 - it was more than four-years after BUF’s official birth and only when the original federal grant had run out. BUF then required a fresh mandate and the ‘74 elections were to provide a facade of democracy. Today, in 1984— 85, BUF seeks another “new mandate”. This time, however, they are not calling for new elections; they are purging themselves of Haamid Rasheed. But, collectively the same people who allowed Haamid Rasheed to do what he did are still making the decisions at BUF. This of course shall not do.
At best, it can be said that most of the people involved with BUF’s revival still believe in the party discipline more than democratic principles. The business of the black community and its organizations are still considered of no concern to anyone else — and those who break the code of silence surrounding BUF are still outcast. BUF’s leadership have provided for its constituents’ approval a grim record of undemocratic behaviour and decision—making.
Yet, BUF’s code of silence is not just an internal rule. The silence goes much further, it goes beyond BUF, it makes its way into the realm of political power — the provincial and federal governments, where, through conspiracy, it is used rather dishonestly to shore up the Black ethnic vote.
The Federal-Provincial Politics
At Ottawa the new Liberal government of Pierre Trudeau was in power and in Nova Scotia the dying remnant of the Stanfield era ere on their way out. It was easy through BUF for black leaders to assume greater control than ever over their black constituents. They aimed their sights at the defeat of the Nova Scotia Progressive Conservatives. The provincial Tories put up a good fight for control over the black vote, but BUF, a creation of a Liberal government in Ottawa, clearly changed the political equation in Nova Scotia. How black leaders must have relished their newfound power! Black Power!
The disciplined federal Liberals, always aware of the road to power, had made the ethnic vote their target for quite some time. Demonstration grants, such as the $500,000 grant to BUF, served their purpose. These grants captured the ethnic vote for the Liberals, both in Nova Scotia and elsewhere in the country. They assisted in the defeat of the Buchanan-and Stanfield-led Progressive Conservatives at home as elsewhere in the country.
The Conservatives at home viewed the federal Liberal funding to BUF as an intrusion into their provincial jurisdiction, and for some time refused to co-operate with BUF’s leadership. What held up federal funding to BUF was the provincial Conservatives refusal to co-operate with the federal Liberals. This continued for some time to the chagrin of the black community in Nova Scotia. Of greater significance was the fact that the federal Liberal funding left BUF free to kick any, and every, sacred cow of the provincial Progressive Conservative government it chose. Of course the black leaders knew it, and when you got it, you flaunt it.
This animosity endured for the longest time and re-surfaced to frighten the hell out of BUF. Provincially, the Liberals defeated the Tories. Under the Regan liberals Nova Scotia established Canada Assistance Plan (CAP) funding for BUF. That was a big mistake, fixing the formerly independent BUF to a cost sharing arrangement between the provincial and federal government would lead BUF to greater dependence on the provincial government. This was the way the Regan Liberals wanted it, and the federal Liberals allowed. BUF was to kick no sacred cows under a Liberal provincial government, but the Stanfield government had to take it. Provincial Progressive Conservatives forgave neither the federal Liberal government nor BUF for the humiliation they suffered at the hands of black leaders.
So long did this animosity endure that BUF’s executive director worried out loud whether the CAP funding would be honored when the conservative forces of “Honest” John Buchanan defeated Regan’s liberals. Still BUF’s new executive director, Art Criss, had some Progressive Conservative credentials -- he was a title searcher for the Tory law firm of Mclnnis, Cooper & Robertson before going to BUF. But still the BUF Council was in worried disarray. The tide in the politics of the minority game has run its course, and now the blacks were caught like other provincial Liberal organizations in the thick of things between the Tory ‘bleu’ and the Grit ‘rouge
For some time neither Rasheed nor the BUF Council twigged to how a swing in political fortune could bring a renewed political life, and allowing a rough, but nevertheless certain transition from Grit to Tory patronage. The Tories now enjoying the game took their pound of black Liberal flesh. And without a blush the very members of BUF’s board of directors who excelled under Grit patronage made a triumphant transition to the Tories. It was a truly remarkable transition for BUF -- other Grit organizations had been unable to flip-flop to Torydom quite so easily. Yet with one shoe down, still there is another one up.
What made BUF different was political opportunism with the highly visible black community. The Tories did in fact steal the page from the Grits. Now the blacks toe the line and pay the price of Tories.
BUF had to change its focus from that of social animation (black consciousness-raising action, i.e.. protest) to the delivery of social programs like any other civil service organization. Politically, BUF was now dead, it now had to defend program delivery, both its own, or lack of it, and that of the provincial government. Provincial government funding muted BUF’s voices of protest. The once proactive organization grew increasingly reactive, remote, invisible and finally irrelevant to the cause of Nova Scotia’s black community.
BUF had allowed itself to be used by the federal Liberals, as the provincial Tories are now using it. If black Nova Scotians had had a history of being in the backwaters of Canadian political life until 1968, what a way we chose to come to the fore!
Last Days of Rasheed’s BUFDUBBED a five—year experiment in black self—determination in 1968, BUF was 15 years old when, in 1983, it suffered a funding cut after a government audit revealed “13 areas of concern,” which “at worse constitute . . . a violation of our funding agreement with the BUF and an abuse of public funds.”
With the resignation of BUF Council Chairman Clyde Bishop, came an announcement of a second audit. The text of Social Services Deputy Minister John A. Mackenzie’s seven-page letter, outlining the 13-areas of concern revealed that the first audit, was published in the local press. The entire black community divided on the issue. Liberal Opposition leader Sandy Cameron issued a public statement, accusing the Social Services minister of ignoring the legitimate concerns of black Nova Scotians. The federal department of the Secretary of State reluctantly froze all future funds to BUF until long overdue activity and financial reports were received. These were some of the more significant events characterizing the last days of Rasheed’s BUF.
The first audit revealed that Haamid Rasheed had: a) rented a car from a national dealer on a continuous basis for some time with BUF funds; b) used $2,000 of BUF funds to pay for the insurance on his private vehicle, a 1981, blue 4WD Toyota; and c) received somehow $4,987 in pay roll advances.” (One occurred previous to March 31, 1982, the remainder as at March 31, 1983.)
Moreover, BUF salary cheques were improperly signed, minutes of meetings were inadequately recorded, and $9,371.51 in staff benefits and income tax remittance was not paid to Revenue Canada. Rasheed retained sole and exclusive control over all financial record keeping at BUF.
No stranger to controversy, Haamid Rasheed (born Art Criss, 38 years—ago near Kentville, N.S.) had changed his name and converted to Islam back in the 70’s, causing quite a stir in predominantly Baptist black Nova Scotia. Persistently. Rasheed dismissed allegations as a combination of unfair press coverage and irresponsible charges from embittered former employees. His worst mistake, however, came at the July 30, 1983 “emergency meeting” of the BUF governing Council, where in response to accusations regarding car rentals, Rasheed countered: “No, no, no! How many times do I have to say, No?”
Faced by yet another “Emergency Meeting” on August 10, Rasheed’s answers were somewhat different. By this time BUF Chairman Clyde Bishop and BUF Councillor Rev. Charles Fox of Amherst had proof of the car rentals. Rasheed admitted they had occurred. He explained he thought they had been given the authority to exercise his own discretion on the issue.
He also admitted using BUF funds for his vehicle insurance, excusing his action as an honest mistake, and indicating that he would correct the err-or by repaying the $2,000 sum. In addition he agreed to repay his $4,987 salary advance by March 31, 1984. Still, the BUF Council did not remove Rasheed.
A January 23, 1984 letter from the Social Services Department made clear the provincial government’s view of Rasheed’s future role within the organization: “no provincial funding will
be provided. . . in any event if Mr. Rasheed is to be chief administrative officer the Department made it clear in its letter of December 23, 1983 that if a proposal [for renewed funding] were submitted showing Mr. Rasheed in any position . . . he could have signing authority involving
provincial funds.”
BUF Council chairman Edith Cromwell only officially announced Rasheed’s eventual dismissal some two months later, in March 1984.
Responsibility for delay lay at least in part with the then Social Services Minister, the late Edmund Morris. The January 23 letter constitutes a complete reversal of his position taken in October 1983. At that time Mr. Morris issued a statement to the press saying that: “They [BUF Council] must take a livelier role in keeping their books in the proper form.” Regarding demands to freeze provincial funding to BUF the minister said: “We’ll not be doing that.”
The signal to Rasheed and BUF Council was clear — things were under control, and they relaxed. All the information available to Edmund Morris in January was available to him in October, before he issued his statement clearing BUF on October 20. On October 11, 1983 the Deputy Minister’s letter, outlining the 13-areas of concern, was received at BUF offices in Dartmouth, so surely the Minister had received his copy of that letter by the time of his October 20 statement to the press clearing BUF of wrongdoing. What had happened, then, to change his verdict?
A shift in public opinion was occurring. By now, the details of the Deputy Minister’s letter had been published in the press in their entirety (save appendices), just eight days after the Minister’s statement in question. Morris was under siege from the Black communities’ committees - in particular the North Preston Ratepayers - which were agitating for a full public accounting.
In addition to Liberal leader Sandy Cameron, NDP leader Alexa McDonough told the Minister “to stop pretending that there is no serious problem at BUF,” and start listening to the hundreds of black people complaining about the organization. Editorials were appearing in the local press, and jokes were being told throughout the city about how you could get your parking tickets paid through going to work for BUF.
Perhaps there were other electoral, reasons for the delaying tactic used by Morris. Perhaps the Tories had learned from the Liberal masters years before: shoring up the ethnic vote is a basic ingredient in political survival. Morris, MLA for the constituency of Halifax Needham, has more than his share of ethnic voters. His continuing inability to win convincing electoral majorities in Needham seems consistent with his reluctance to cut off BUF funding when all available information suggested that the action was the only prudent course.
But if anyone was late in taking decisive action, or in getting the message, it was the BUF Council. Even when Rasheed’s resignation was announced in March, some Council members wanted him to stay. A BUF insider told the press that “Some of them want to continue without public funding,” in order to have Rasheed remain.
Still, the Department of Social Services, in its own words, “continues to be sympathetic to, and available for, funding support of an agency that will effectively and responsibly address the social development needs of black citizens of Nova Scotia.” In the department’s eyes, that agency continues to be BUF.
Even before the ballots were cast in the last provincial election, the Minister announced a renewal of funding for BUF. A new BUF staff has been hired and put to work. However - and this is the crucial point - the same board of directors is making the decisions in the same closed—door environment. There has been talk of a public hearing.
In November, 1968 I glimpsed, along with many other black people, the promise of a truly democratic organization that would unite blacks throughout Nova Scotia in a struggle for social justice.
Instead the organization born of that movement, BUF, has degenerated into a private, undemocratic, patronage-ridden clique. Bureaucracy and secrecy have replaced the democratic impulse.
The lack of democracy in BUF has many roots. The long legacy of oppression - from slavery to today’s more restrained forms of racism - has provided a poor training ground for democracy. Poverty and dependence produce cynicism and resignation more often than they produce democracy or democratic reform movements among oppressed people. But while black Nova Scotians have not really believed in democracy for themselves, white Nova Scotians have not really wanted it for anyone else. Patronage appointments and co-optation have been easier than genuine power sharing and co-operation. Democracy in Nova Scotia shall continue to be thwarted so long as black Nova Scotians hardly believe in it and so long as white Nova Scotians continue to provide ample proof for distrusting it in the hands of other people.
In 1968 the blacks of Nova Scotia could pull together because volatile racial issues forced them to do so. Since 1968, an every-man-for-himself game, replete with paternalism and patronage, has replaced what we hoped would be a genuinely democratic movement.
The actions of Morris and BUF Council point to the need for a full public hearing into the issue. (Would, for example, the public interest be better by prosecuting Rasheed and having a full airing of the entire affair?) Until we know what led to the degeneration of BUF, we won’t know whether today’s BUF is any better than the old one. BUF will go on and on, and few of us will be any wiser for its passage.
Still another concern arises from the problem created by BUF and it points to a need to better understand how the politics of the minority game is really played. We need to know how to avoid becoming a pawn in political games that do not serve our interests. We need to understand how to avoid the co-optation of minority leaders that separate them from their own constituencies. Once we understand how to avoid these perils, we might be better able to place the noble struggle of principle between black and white Nova Scotians on an honest and dignified footing where it should be.
We might all be able to recapture the democratic potential of ‘68.
This article originally appeared, together with six photos, in the March, 1985 issue of NEW MARITIMES Vol. 3, No. 6, at pp. 10-13.